19:01:43 #startmeeting 19:01:43 Let the Jenkins meeting commence! 19:01:54 #chair rtyler hare_brain 19:01:54 Current chairs: hare_brain kohsuke rtyler 19:02:05 #info https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Governance+Meeting+Agenda 19:02:17 #topic Approving another batch of stickers 19:02:45 In every year, Jan-Feb is a month that we use a lot of stickers 19:02:52 ... between FOSDEM & SCALE 19:03:18 In FOSDEM we handed out about 1000, and I expect similar number in SCALE 19:03:31 So I want to put an order for more stickers 19:04:16 The two new variations were popular in FOSDEM 19:04:21 https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/download/attachments/2916393/superhero-all.svg 19:04:28 https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/download/attachments/2916393/ninjenkins.svg 19:04:43 but OTOH it often just resulting in the same person getting 3 stickers instead of just one 19:04:54 So one could argue whether that's the best use of money 19:05:02 and i still have zero stickers :D 19:05:26 Can you join us in SCALE? :-) it's in the end of this week 19:05:41 nope.. still same issue 19:05:48 kohsuke: where? 19:05:49 kohsuke, have no Visa's and highload because of jenkins bugs :( 19:06:00 Los Angeles 19:06:16 not getting value 19:06:38 irf, please wait, meeting is going on channel atm 19:06:48 ok sure 19:06:51 will wait 19:07:00 BTW there are two more designs 19:07:00 https://twitter.com/masanobuimai/status/564248061296140288/photo/1 19:07:00 irf, value="${buildenv.get(\"a\",\"\")}" 19:07:16 https://twitter.com/masanobuimai/status/564349882190659584 19:07:24 Stickers are quite cheap BTW. 3 stickers is not a big problem 19:07:53 +1 for more stickers. they're inexpensive but help to build awareness 19:08:00 I'm thinking 2000 of the standard one, 1000 each for super hero and Ninja 19:08:33 kohsuke, do you have some image where hudson is killed? :D 19:08:35 kohsuke: As I remember, there was a discussion regarding Japanese comics (I suppose it's related for last 2k stickers) 19:08:44 or oracle... 19:08:53 That Japanese comic one was the super hero one 19:09:09 somebody said maybe there's no point in having that text that no one can read 19:09:10 integer: Hudson is alive ;) Don't be evil 19:09:34 integer`: I no longer feel any urge/need to rub it in 19:09:53 anyone else having problems with the jdk installer? 19:09:54 again jelly exception 19:10:09 irf, then after meeting 19:10:18 ok 19:10:20 sure 19:10:23 plz 19:10:24 as in, it's not populating the jdk's and also throwing an error when you try and download the jdk? 19:10:30 A new IRC channel would be useful.... 19:10:40 sean_abbott, please wait until meeting on channel ends 19:10:56 Any more thoughts on stickers, can I consider that blessed? 19:10:57 ok 19:11:15 +1 19:11:15 +1 for stickers. There's a link to jenkins-ci.org on Ninja one as well 19:11:23 +1 19:11:28 +1 for stickers 19:11:28 +1 19:11:50 #agreed kohsuke will order 2000 of the standard one, 1000 each for super hero and Ninja (should last for 2015) 19:12:04 BTW, possibly related https://twitter.com/kimika127/status/562866597078265856 19:12:21 :D 19:12:23 #topic IntelliJ license 19:12:30 oh kostasya isn't here 19:12:32 I'm afraid that one could sound sexist 19:12:36 kohsuke, its me 19:12:49 integer` = kostasya? 19:12:52 Do we consider all JetBrains licenses? (ReSharper, etc.) 19:12:52 yes 19:12:56 oh 19:13:07 (= KostyaSha I think) 19:13:19 jglick: thanks! 19:13:21 IRC doesn't support multiple logins :( 19:13:45 oleg-nenashev: yeah, I think so 19:13:45 speaking to kohsuke btw, though I understand this may sound less this way for manga-aware people? 19:13:47 oleg-nenashev, and RubyMine that can be useful for infra work with puppet 19:14:23 batmat: I agree with you that it's better for me to stay away from it, especially outside Japan 19:14:28 it's sensitive area 19:14:37 back to the topic... 19:14:58 #info it used to be that I applied for IntelliJ and RubyMine licenses on behalf of the project and handed out the licenses to those who are interested 19:15:13 #info but this year I noticed that JetBrains has changed the OSS license terms and I no longer qualify 19:15:20 kohsuke, could you pass JB communication to somebody else to not waste your time? 19:15:37 #info https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/buy/choose_edition.jsp?license=OPEN_SOURCE 19:15:52 KostyaSha: there's no real "communication" to speak of 19:16:12 I just fill in the form, and somebody from their side get back to me in a month or so with the license 19:16:17 kohsuke, but support redirected me to you 2m ago 19:16:46 kohsuke, i mean part of providing licenses for those who need them 19:16:56 kohsuke: I could directly push somebody from CloudBees in St. Petersburg, but I'm not eligible to get OSS license as well 19:16:57 If it helps, I'd be happy to write something like "I'm the lead of the project and this person is our official liaison, and I'm not qualified license-wise but he is" 19:17:10 oleg-nenashev, from CB ? 0_o 19:17:13 oleg-nenashev: I assume you mean JetBrains, not CloudBees! 19:17:18 ohh 19:17:29 From JetBrains, of course 19:17:46 sorry 19:17:48 So I guess the primary question for me is, who satisfies the conditions and is willing to talk to JetBrains? 19:17:54 KostyaSha: you said you don't qualify either 19:18:21 The problematic term specifically is "You do not perform any paid support, consulting or training services for your OS project, and you do not distribute paid versions of your OS software. If you provide paid services for or distribute paid versions of your OS software, we might have other options available for your project" 19:18:53 probably oleg-nenashev also. kohsuke should we first check with JB our case? 19:19:10 I suppose I can ask 19:19:17 maybe oleg-nenashev can talk with JB directly and describe situation 19:19:20 come to think of it, that's what master rtyler taught me 19:19:37 kohsuke: Who is you contact at JB? 19:19:47 *your 19:19:55 Like I said, there's no contact. I just fill in the form, and every year someone new answers that email 19:20:04 kohsuke, we have some direct personal contacts in JB :) 19:20:06 But I can find those email addresses that I interacted in the past if it helps 19:20:32 KostyaSha: can you send that to oleg-nenashev? 19:20:44 Probably it helps. Actually, JB guys do not like Jenkins due to obvious reasons :) 19:20:56 ha-ha :) 19:21:36 If it's just Stefan Wolf who can use the license, maybe we'll ask him to talk to JetBrains 19:21:46 Nadya Kudryavtseva 19:21:46 Community Support Coordinator 19:22:15 He answered on my question about licenses renewal 19:22:18 *She 19:22:33 and the email address that came from is opensource@jetbrains.com 19:22:52 right 19:23:08 oleg-nenashev: do you want to take this AI, or should we punt to wolfs? 19:23:32 howdy. 19:24:04 kohsuke: Lets ask Stefan to use the official way. If it does not help, I'll try a workaround 19:24:33 #action kohsuke to write to wolfs that he is in charge for getting the license he wants. fall back to oleg-nenashev if that doesn't work 19:24:37 kohsuke, i think answer mean that license key is still active and you can continue providing it 19:25:03 I want those emails to go to wolfs :-) 19:25:34 KostyaSha: should we move on? 19:25:34 So, IDEA + RubyMine + probably ReSharper (if somebody wants to hack WinSW). Do we need anything else? 19:25:34 kohsuke, then redirect contact to him and give him key and bless :) 19:25:51 oleg-nenashev, teamcity?:D 19:26:02 I still don't understand this notion of contact and key 19:26:15 Like I said, all I do every year is just file a form that's on the public website 19:26:30 For all I know the form is handled by an intern of the year 19:26:41 There's no continued "conversation" of any sort 19:26:42 kohsuke, you are contact person for providing keys for Jenkins project 19:27:22 All right, I'll write to opensource@jetbrains.com that this year expect to hear from somebody else as I'm disqualified. 19:27:27 This key is multiuser and they renew it every time you contact them 19:28:04 I don't want to touch the license that I'm not allowed to use. It's not kosher. 19:28:15 KostyaSha: Can we move on to the next topic? 19:28:19 yes 19:28:28 #topic Should we have an "ops lead"? Adding more infra team members? Moderator teams? 19:28:39 #info https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/046RwHh3Nko 19:28:55 so more of a continuation of INFRA-240 discussion 19:28:56 hi to all 19:28:57 INFRA-240:Releasing plugins is not possible as Artifactory is refusing credentials (Resolved) https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/INFRA-240 19:29:27 +1 for ops lead 19:29:43 rtyler indicated me offline that he expects (or wants) to be able to bring back more cycles to the project 19:30:03 -1 for lead 19:30:05 and I understand that KostyaSha feels strongly about meritocracy 19:30:09 Why not an ops-lead, not sure it's that important as already said by some on the ML. 19:30:12 I developed a maven plugin that create a jar and the pom.. all seems ok, but the jenkins plugin for artifactory seems not find the jar and does not deploy it to artifactory. any suggestions? 19:30:32 please :) 19:30:49 I also took some push back internally and I need to work in CB to figure out how much time of who I can get engaged for this 19:30:50 kohsuke, i'm lead and worked on many projects with hundreds servers, jenkins needs just resolve issues 19:30:55 rtyler is the only candidate IMO. BTW, it would be great to avoid 1-person bottlenecks 19:31:12 wat 19:31:19 I've been summoned 19:31:20 luckysideburn: we are in the project meeting, so let's hold off questions until that ends. but you are welcome to participate in the discussion 19:31:28 oh right, meeting 19:31:40 the cold in boston made me forget, I swear! 19:32:56 my main idea that things must be fixed/resolved with peer reviews, lead is redundant here 19:32:56 So I'm back tracking somewhat on my proposal about nominating the lead role, though I still think the underlying concern is valid 19:33:00 one suggestion I made to kohsuke was to make a board member "responsible" for infra 19:33:11 and in turn, responsible for infra to the project, and driving that forward 19:33:21 since the project and infra are obviously closely intertwined :) 19:34:07 Offtopic/Personal update. I've finally got approvals from my current employer. I'll be able to officially contribute to jenkins-infra starting from March 1st 19:34:14 \o/ 19:34:28 I think the ops-focused board member would work, though not sure about "in turn" part 19:34:46 For example, I doubt if hare_brain is willing to do that 19:34:54 plz ping me when meeting done .. 19:35:03 I'm basically suggestion making the infra more "consumer oriented" 19:35:21 in that, the priorities would be more driven by what the project needs, which would be agreed upon by the board nad in meetings 19:35:31 it's kind of haphazard right now based on time and effort 19:36:09 We need more board members anyway.. 19:36:10 rtyler: can I assume that you are stepping up to that role? 19:36:15 you can 19:36:24 rtyler: you mean having somehow a backlog/todolist agreed/planned in advance and trying to make it forward instead of just doing things you like when you find time? 19:36:32 hare_brain: yes, this would be a good opportunity to add more 19:36:34 batmat: basically :P 19:36:48 I laid out some 2014 goals just as an experiment for infra work 19:37:18 we actually got through a good chunk, but it was largely a list that came out of my brain, instead of being something that would clearly improve the project or make developers or users' lives easier 19:37:39 btw, will there be another thread abt how much you need to engage to be part of that "team"? 19:38:21 batmat: yeah we should have that conversation 19:38:56 My feeling is that lots of people with very little time each isn't as helpful for infra work 19:39:18 it depends on their sticking power 19:39:29 I mean, as said above, we're (almost?) all volunteers here and that's pretty difficult to say "yeah, well I promise I'll be able to be on call if something falls down" 19:39:31 a lot of little pieces of one person's time, like KostyaSha, definitely adds up :) 19:40:26 Yep, occasional contributions should be appreciated 19:40:56 rtyler, i had full vacation and didn't get ability to end work :( now i'm busy with jenkins bugs like git-plugin and flexible-publish :( But usually i have time for contributions 19:41:01 I guess I'm going to produce a revised proposal about adding two more people to the board, nominating rtyler for one of them and as "infra focused" person 19:41:05 Do we have any options excepting the "full infrastructure access"? 19:41:14 rtyler: yes, that's basically how I see it, having more people should help mitigate that issue (btw, I'm definitely candidating here ;-)) 19:41:26 oleg-nenashev: yeah, there's plenty to do in the jenkins-infra repo 19:41:30 oleg-nenashev: no access is required 19:41:40 there's a huge lack of organization on my part on what's important and how to do it 19:42:13 Yep. JIRA, Confluense ond ci.jenkins-ci.org can be managed separately as well 19:42:20 rtyler, how much resources/money has infra for running new servers etc? 19:42:47 or all in stickers now? :) 19:43:05 good portion of them are hosted in OSUOSL for free 19:43:12 Some other portions are hosted in Rackspace through their donations 19:43:25 we're getting a bit off topic 19:43:26 Then one (but important) server in Contegix for pay 19:43:31 Are they are in cloud? Can servers be reprovisioned? 19:43:31 yes 19:44:10 +1 rtyler I don't think we're gonna describe the whole infra here? 19:44:10 Should I go ahead and schedule ToI to spead knowledge, or do you want to do it differently rtyler? 19:44:31 it'll have to wait another couple weeks, earliest would be second week in march 19:44:48 kohsuke: morea KT as stephenc says ? :-) 19:44:56 KT, fine, KT 19:45:01 for the purposes of the meeting, can we get come to a conclusion on the topic at hand 19:45:19 #info the jenkins-infra team business is discussed in #jenkins-infra on Freenode 19:45:22 i mean that ancient platforms can be a blocker, I have no desire to work with ruby 1.8 and etc :D 19:45:25 * rtyler assumes he's a chair 19:45:29 heh 19:45:33 yes you are 19:46:17 #action kohsuke to produce a revised proposal about adding two more people to the board, nominating rtyler for one of them and as "infra focused" person 19:46:28 \o/ 19:46:42 Do we vote on the infrastructure lead today? 19:46:52 negative 19:46:57 #agreed rtyler will schedule "knowledge transfer" of infra in the next month or so 19:47:26 oleg-nenashev: incidentally the board will be meeting next week, so I'll get the proposal more solidified 19:47:49 For one, I want even number of people to break ties, and so we want to add one more person aside from rtyler 19:48:01 ideally someone from different background and so on 19:48:15 I'm counting on hare_brain's wisdom 19:48:30 I think it's good enough coverage of this topic for today? 19:48:58 #topic Who should we reach out for JUC speakers? 19:49:25 One of the feedback from the last year's JUC was that some speakers weren't very good 19:49:38 And I thought one way to fix this is not just to wait for people to submit proposals but for us to go out and ask 19:49:59 People doing JUC in Tokyo does this for about half the talks and those are all generally well received 19:50:30 I'm happy to write to them, but I need help from everyone for suggestions 19:50:44 kohsuke, usually regular event covers all topics in first year. If question is about quality, then maybe number of JUCs can be reduced 19:51:15 I wonder if this is the way to go. Isn't the issue more on the call selection side here? 19:51:21 i usually do one report per year after huge work 19:51:33 What was the issue again? Talk quality? Speaker? Subject?* 19:51:56 batmat: selection side can be improved too 19:51:57 kohsuke: every conference or meetup I've been involved in organizing, we've proactively recruited many speakers 19:52:18 rtyler: that's what I thought 19:52:20 from the people the organizers knew were doing interesting things in the space, or were compelling speakers, things like that 19:52:28 half my FOSDEM devrooms were recruited ;) 19:52:33 recruited to submit proposals of course 19:52:39 right 19:53:21 did you know who are in Europe, or did you ignore that and pinged people wherever they are? 19:53:54 I can think of a few people 19:54:26 like https://github.com/magnayn who did docker plugin 19:54:43 Surya who did https://github.com/groupon/DotCi 19:54:47 kohsuke, you already requested mesos devs 19:55:04 kohsuke, maybe also try somebody from RH? 19:55:04 What about drulli? 19:55:18 Yeah, drulli, great suggestion 19:55:21 disk-usage plugin was refactored by RH 19:55:36 and they did the first version, too :-) 19:55:41 ogondza: ^^ 19:56:06 Did danielbe_ spoke in JUC last year? 19:56:22 kohsuke: I pinged people from all over 19:56:29 I think .au was the furthest I ttried recruiting from 19:56:37 kohsuke: i don't think so. 19:56:52 rtyler: did that work :-D 19:57:33 kohsuke, > oleg-nenashev maintain many plugins ;) 19:57:51 Yes, I want to see regulars in this channel present 19:58:03 Slide-O-1ix, larrys, autojack, oleg-nenashev, ... 19:58:03 but i hope to have some Russian speaking event someday 19:58:10 and you too, KostyaSha 19:58:20 kohsuke: couldn't get the aussie 19:58:29 I consider submitting an abstract 19:58:54 one scriptable way could be to extract committer emails from jenkins-all repo and filter on domain names? :-) 19:58:57 And there's the FreeBSD guy, and I think he's in here 19:59:18 well, wouldn't work very well since many people have @gmail.com and the likes I guess ;-) 19:59:20 batmat: I don't want to do mass mail though 19:59:32 or do you think its' fair? 19:59:54 kohsuke, "Call for papers" to devlist? 20:00:09 or it was already.. 20:00:15 Sure, I was thinking that this way you could do a first extract of the most active ones and then even filter them manually to see if you want to ask them 20:00:33 I can do that again, but I feel that I need to write individually or else it gets under their radar 20:00:52 batmat: right, OK, so it's to build the candidate list 20:00:58 i tried with other combination of single/double quotes .. still no luck :( 20:01:06 kohsuke: I will not make it to JUC, I can not think of any RH speaker 20:01:09 kohsuke: yup 20:01:40 all right, time is up so it's really just a call for help to let me know if you can think of any names 20:02:00 #info please ping kohsuke if you know anyone doing interesting things in this space that we should invite to JUC 20:02:14 #topic LTS status check 20:02:30 kohsuke: we are ready 20:02:47 ogondza: yay, nice and sweet 20:02:50 #topic next meeting 20:03:11 kohsuke: Probably, tfenelly could talk about his vision of Jenkins WebUI 20:03:11 #info Next meeting will be March 4th same time 20:03:30 and maybe he and kevin can finally meet 20:03:38 #endmeeting